Same record. Four readers.
Reviewer seats are unlimited, so each function works in the same assessment and reads the part that concerns it.
| Procurement and SourcingChief Sourcing Officer · Procurement Director | IT and Information SecurityCIO · CISO | Clinical and Quality LeadershipCMO · CMIO · CNO | Legal, Risk, Privacy and ComplianceGeneral Counsel · Privacy Officer · Compliance Officer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The problem | Every vendor arrives with a different questionnaire and a different definition of done. Terms that matter are negotiated after signature, when leverage is gone. | Security questionnaires measure the vendor’s perimeter. They do not reach the model provider two hops down, the tenant boundary at the model layer, or the API scope an agent uses to write into the EHR. | A model that passed review at signing is not the model in the clinic a year later. Scribes assert findings no clinician stated; predictive tools invite automation bias. None of it is visible to a security review. | Vendor paper arrives with one-sided liability disclaimers, training rights buried in derivative-data definitions, and BAAs that never name the model provider. A regulator will ask for a record, not a recollection. |
| What the record gives you | One scoped question set per deployment pattern. Vendors respond in a dedicated portal. Qualifying findings produce suggested clause templates for counsel review, linked to the finding reference and supporting evidence. | Named subprocessor chains with flow-down status, tenant separation and cross-customer learning controls, agentic access scope with audit log and rollback, each evidenced against the question it supports. | Human-in-the-loop controls carried into draft contract controls. Drift, calibration and subgroup performance evidenced and re-evidenced on a defined cycle. Model incidents treated as distinct from breach. Suspension rights you hold unilaterally. | Every question cites the provision it is written against. The ledger records who asked, who answered, who scored and when. Sample contract controls address indemnification, retention, disclosure and incident notice from the finding that produced them. |
| Domains that matter most | D11 · D12 · D2 | D9 · D10 · D8 | D4 · D6 · D5 | D1 · D3 · D2 |
| Operating fact | Review cycle from intake to committee packet: under two weeks | Evidence rated separately from answers: verified, partial, documentation gap, missing | Reassessment on a defined cycle; every version retained | Full record export at any time; the record outlives the subscription |
Across the healthcare continuum.
Select an organization type. The problem it faces, what the record gives it, and the domains that carry the most weight.
Hospitals and Health Systems
Govern clinical decision support, ambient EHR scribes, and predictive risk tools across complex multi-facility networks.
Dozens of AI tools across service lines, each approved by a different committee under a different standard. Renewals recur; reviewers move on.
Reporting by hospital or business unit, portfolio risk by residual score and spend, and a board packet that reads the same for every vendor.
Clinician sign-off can be bypassed by batch-approve in the EHR integration.
Illustrative. Sample data.
Run the review on a vendor you are evaluating now.
Thirty minutes. A guided walkthrough using representative reference architectures shows the scoped question set, findings and committee record.